| |
|
|
1. Did you know that Darwinian Evolution is based on an atheistic, materialistic philosophy that does not allow for any involvement of a higher power and that the proponents of Darwinian Evolution are doing everything in their power to stop, not only the teaching of other scientific explanations, but even criticism of Darwinian Evolution? What do these evolutionists really think about those who believe in a higher power? All the most prominent Darwinists proclaim naturalistic philosophy when they think it safe to do so.
|
Richard Dawkins, Evolutionist at Oxford University, exults that Darwin "made it possible to be an intellectually fulfilled atheist."
|
|
Richard Lewontin, evolutionary geneticist, has written that scientists must stick to philosophical materialism regardless of the evidence, because "we cannot allow a Divine Foot in the door."
|
|
Stephen Jay Gould condescendingly offers to allow religious people to express their subjective opinions about morals, provided they don't interfere with the authority of scientists to determine the "facts" -- one of the facts being that God is merely a comforting myth.
|
|
Carl Sagan had nothing but contempt for those who deny that humans and all other species "arose by blind physical and chemical forces over eons from slime."
|
"It is absolutely safe to say that, if you meet somebody who claims not to believe in evolution, that person is ignorant, stupid or insane (or wicked, but I'd rather not consider that)."
– Leading Darwinist, Richard Dawkins
|
|
"I cheerfully acknowledge," he (Herbert Spencer) writes in The Principles of Psychology, that the hypothesis of evolution is beset by "serious difficulties" scientifically. Yet, "save for those who still adhere to the Hebrew myth or to the doctrine of special creations derived from it, there is no alternative but this hypothesis or no hypothesis."
|
|
Douglas Futuyma writes that "by coupling undirected, purposeless variation to the blind, uncaring process of natural selection, Darwin made theological or spiritual explanations of the life process superfluous" ( Futuyma 1986, 3)
|
Karl Vogt noted happily that Darwin’s theory "turns the Creator—and his occasional intervention in the revolutions of the earth and in the production of species—without any hesitation out of doors, inasmuch as it does not leave the smallest room for the agency of such a Being" (cited in Hodge 1994, 110)
Mere Creation, "You Guys Lost" Is Design a Closed Issue? By Nancy R. Pearcy |
James D. Watson
In Scientific America, April 2003, p.68, the co-discoverer of the structure of the DNA molecule said, "I was born curious. I would rather read economic history than history, for example, because I liked explanations. And so if you wanted an explanation for life, it had to be about the molecular basis for life I never thought there was a spiritual basis for life; I was very lucky to be brought up by a father who had no religious beliefs. I didn't have that hang-up. My mother was nominally a Catholic, but that's as far as it went."
|
|
